I would suggest to Mr. Bachand that if Mr. Bachand wants this to go through with unanimity, which is what he has said, if we go back to his original motion, that can happen.
I would also suggest to Mr. Bachand that what he is being sold by Mr. Dewar as a friendly amendment is in fact a totally separate issue from Mr. Bachand's motion. It is not a friendly amendment. What Mr. Dewar has said--and, Mr. Dewar, I do want to quote you accurately and I don't want to torque or change your words, but I wrote them down--is that you believe it would be to have hearings on the events of or surrounding the MPCC, the recent events....