I have a point of order.
Earlier, I asserted that the committee was free to proceed as it agreed. In fact, we can disregard the section 38 arguments. I was clear on that point. I understood that General Watkin had to consult his client and then get back to us. I would like this to be done. Otherwise, we are going to end up with people who don't want to answer our questions. I think it is essential that the general come back and explain, on behalf of his client, how he sees the situation.
Do we have an understanding?