General, in 30 seconds, it seems to me that what we've arrived at here is the difference between what the committee has a right to do and certainly, according to the instruction of Mr. Walsh, to ask what the government is doing and what is their position versus actually overseeing, making comment on, or doing an inquiry of what the military is actually doing.
It's a ridiculous question, I suppose, but is there any brief way for you to be able to describe to us how this committee can make that distinction? What are the questions that would lead us to the unanswerable versus the ones that are the responsibility of the committee?