Of course not. But on the argument we're having--and it's not really fair to put everybody on the spot on this--what was the information available as to the pattern of abuse? What other options were considered, apart from simply transferring prisoners to the Afghan authorities? Were any other options seriously pursued?
Let's say you had a discussion at a meeting and somebody said, “You know what, the risk is just too great. Why don't we set up our own prison, set up an ISAP prison, and transfer them somewhere else?” Were any other options put in place that would have led to a different conclusion?