I think it's important because a lot of the conversation, a lot of questions, are about general torture that may have taken place in Afghanistan institutions over years of experience and so on, and what your role was. My understanding of this whole issue is that we want to be very clear about what happened with our Canadian military and authorities in terms of their responsibility and their actions. I'm hearing you confirm that happened after the time when we had really understood there were accusations about detainee transfers that came from Canadian authorities. I think it's really important to keep it on the record, that we do that.
The second point I want to go to is backing up, and I think, Ms. Garwood-Filbert, you were talking about the fact that Canada was working hard months before that about dealing with the institutions, and the upgrades, and all that had to take place. Can you talk a bit more about what went into that, both the planning and also the kinds of dollars and infrastructure and what the end result of that was? We tend to gloss over that important point that Canada was trying to improve and upgrade the infrastructure and facilities. I think it's an incredibly important part of what the role was. Considering we hadn't been in the field that long as active military participants, I think the response was very quick. That may be a bias on my part, so I'd like to hear your view on that.