Mr. Chairman, I agree with Mr. Hawn that obviously there will be other issues that we'll probably be dealing with at some point, but the fact is that the committee was undertaking a study. Maybe if the wording had been “continue with” the study...
We all know that we're going to deal with the detainee issue, so it seems to be a bit of a moot point. We're simply confirming what we've already been engaged in for the last number of months.
I agree with you, Mr. Chairman, that in fact this is really stating the obvious. This motion is not exclusive. It doesn't in any way suggest that we're not going to deal with any other issues. I've spoken before about what happens post-2011.
Let's deal with the issue at hand. We were dealing with the detainee issue. Let's finish the detainee issue. The steering committee would only recommend, presumably, the same thing, that this is what we're going to be dealing with.
Mr. Chairman, we have the motion. It's in order. I suggest we vote on the motion that's before the committee. The steering committee will probably come back as well with other issues that we can deal with in the future. I say we get on with it.