Okay.
I was just curious. In your arguments before the court, you argued that sections 7, 10, and 12 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms would apply to the detainees. But you didn't argue that any other provisions of the charter, including section 8, “the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure”, and section 9, “the right not to be arbitrarily detained or imprisoned”, should apply to these detainees.
I was wondering why you didn't make these arguments. They're all legal rights. And if some of the legal rights in the charter apply, wouldn't they all apply?