Can I just run through the test that appears to be used by the Department of Justice in redacting documents? The officials determine whether the disclosure of the information would be injurious to international relations, national defence, or national security. If the officials conclude that the disclosure would result in injury, they must then determine whether the public interest in disclosure outweighs the importance of public interest in non-disclosure. So there is a balance here between the claims of injury and the claims of the public interest.
That seems to me to be a matter of opinion, shall we call it--perhaps legal opinion, but it's surely a matter of opinion that would vary from person to person.
I'm a lawyer, you're a lawyer. Can you tell us whether that test is something that can be consistent or reliable, or is it a matter of opinion? And what kinds of results did you get from that test being applied by different people?