Well, Mr. Chairman, I would have been inclined to vote in favour of our motion as amended with the exclusion of “begin without delay to” until.... We recognize that it gutted it, but it still had a tiny, tiny bit of the original meaning of the motion.
Mr. Wilfert's amendment, as we understand it, will not only close the door but he's going to take hammer and nail and screws to make sure it will simply not open. This is not acceptable. He is basically saying that everything is going to be focused securely and exclusively on the issue of the detainees.
Can Mr. Wilfert imagine a situation where we have—