The only ones I'm specifically aware of are the ones the committee has already been made aware of. In my experience and during the interviews and the visits I took at the NDS, we never uncovered a specific allegation of abuse.
I think what has to be taken into the broader context is that we spend about 15 minutes with these people, and we ask them a series of questions according to a template that we developed. It's very thorough, and it's not that we haven't done the due diligence in order to ensure that these people aren't in harm's way. However, if they don't have visible markings or unless they come forward to us and state that they have been abused, we don't have any broader or more specific knowledge of actual cases.