I think the question I'm trying to get at is to ask, were you aware of any discussions about there being another choice?
And perhaps I could ask General Grant the same question, as to whether or not there was ever active consideration given to not transferring prisoners but rather establishing either a Canadian-run prison or a NATO-run prison or some kind of facility that would say we have enough concern about the risks, based on our historical information and our sense of what's going on, that we're simply not in a position right now to transfer prisoners; that we'll help the Afghans build up their prison system, but until we're satisfied that they've made more progress, we're simply going to keep them ourselves.
Was any consideration given to that approach? There's some reference to it in the documents—some discussions with the Dutch, or some other documents. You both have the advantage of seeing unredacted documents that I have not been able to see yet. Perhaps one day all truth will be revealed, but right now I don't get to see the blacked-out parts and you get to see those, so perhaps you can fill me in a little bit.