Yes, 2007. What happened was a facilities inspection, during which we went through the prison population with an NDS officer at our shoulder. However, in the supplementary arrangements we had an instrument that allowed for private interviews of detainees, so that on subsequent visits we would be able—and this I did myself, on subsequent occasions—to go off into a room, sit down with the interpreter and a Canadian-transferred detainee and get a frank assessment from them of what their conditions of incarceration were and what the treatment was. So we had from May 2007 a much stronger instrument in place.
Coming back to your earlier point, though, the challenge we faced in the period through April 2007 was that the instrument we had put in place to generate feedback to us was not generating that feedback. So we didn't realize that the first line of defence was not fully functional—the assurances that prisoners would be well treated.