That really is not an answer to my question. I understand that there are policies. I'm aware of them.
What I wanted to know is how do you determine, how do you assure yourself, that the information you have received wasn't obtained by those means on an individual case, or is it like the government has said, that it's unless we have evidence that this particular piece of information was obtained by a particular form of torture? Did you have to have that level of knowledge? The reputation is very clear. It seemed to be well known. How did you make that judgment?