I don't have the specific recommendation in front of me, but COMPAS does spend a fair bit of time talking about stakeholder communication and consultation. The structure we have includes a number of ways in which stakeholder communication does occur, and ways in which we receive feedback from various parts of the sector. The assistant commissioner certainly is one avenue for receiving that feedback. We also have our standards committee, which includes a significant portion of producers as well as other industry players. COMPAS has not suggested that the industry and producer players be changed. We also hold meetings throughout the year with various players of the eastern and western industry. We attend numerous producer meetings and trade shows.
We already have in place many ways in which we facilitate consultation and communication with producers and with other industry players. There may be better methods of doing that. I think we always need to be prepared to look for ways to improve the system, but I think the bottom line is that we do a lot of consulting now, and the current structure does allow for ongoing consultations with all members of the sector. We need to be sure that we consider all perspectives when we're making decisions about any changes we make both in terms of the Canada Grain Act, and in terms of policy as we move forward. We must consider the input from many sectors of the industry and the impacts to all of the sectors.