With regard to the unbiased review of inspections, we already have that system in place. The system is in place for producers who are delivering to a primary elevator. We call it “subject to grade and dockage and protein”, which means that when they deliver to a primary elevator, they can immediately request that the sample be sent to the Grain Commission for an accurate grade. We are the independent party in that position, because the decision of the initial grading is being applied by the primary elevator, so the “subject to grade and dockage” is neutral. We're not inspecting it in the first place and then re-inspecting it. So that is already in place.
The other aspect of our inspection review process is from primary elevator to terminal elevator. You are right, the initial inspection there is done by CGC, and the second level would also be done by CGC. Ultimately we have the Grain Appeal Tribunal, which has inspectors from industry. They are not CGC inspectors who are reviewing it, they are neutral. They're inspectors who are called in to inspect the grain. We have a chairman who reports to the CGC, so there is a link there, but they have a list of inspectors who are brought in. They are getting that third-party look, which is not from CGC inspectors.