I think we need to first of all recognize that COMPAS was not instructed to do a funding or a costing basis for their recommendations. So the COMPAS report does not include an answer to your question.
I think it's very important that we look at the recommendations that would be implemented and discussed, exactly some of the issues you've talked about: the impact on producers, the costs. Ultimately there needs to be a decision made on funding.
The Canadian Grain Commission has been in a situation of being underfunded for a number of years because of the desire to not increase costs to producers. It is a question that is going to have to be addressed going forward. COMPAS puts forth the suggestion that infrastructure costs be funded by appropriation and that service costs be funded by fees. I think it's a model that has some merit, but obviously there needs to be some definition of infrastructure and a definition of services, and then a decision can be made as to whether it's appropriate for government to fund or for producers to fund.