Who would be the basis of the report recommending outsourcing of inspection, when that's been done in-house? How do you think it will impact the work you people have done in the past and will do going forward? How would you have the assurance of continuity of quality assurance, given that it would likely be contracted to the lowest bidder? If this were to be the case--I think you talk about outsourcing and inspection--where would you see that going? I have some difficulty with that, because I've seen that kind of thing happen in other areas in which we've done those kinds of things, and they haven't always been positive.
On September 26th, 2006. See this statement in context.