There seems to be a consensus. No matter what I say, the study will take us longer, and I don’t formally object to that. However, I’d like to hear a few more arguments in favour of allowing us more time and I want to know the names of the additional witnesses that will appear before us.
Yesterday, I had a discussion with David concerning this subject, and he suggested that the people from the commission come back to testify for another half hour. Have we not well prepared our schedule? If we need two additional sittings, I’d like them to be useful and I’d like us to really complete the work we have to do rather than realize, in the end, that we need more time. I don’t want us to postpone our deadlines unduly. It’s up to us to do our work, to make sure that we’ve heard each and every witness that we need to hear. However, I’d like to know who the additional witnesses that will appear before us will be. Perhaps David can give us more information.