I think there are two issues. I'll ask Tom to talk about the dispute resolution proposal.
The other issue is accountability. We specifically say there ought to be no laws that protect the Grain Commission from legal action. Regulatory agencies and government shouldn't have any special protection compared to business, non-profits, or charities. In a democratic society, everyone should be accountable under the law on an equal basis.
There have been some newspaper reports that misunderstood our recommendation on compensation in the two bankruptcy cases. We did not say that the Grain Commission has to compensate. We don't say that. In fact, if all the stakeholders agree that it's better not to have any kind of insurance or licensing or accountability or compensation system, that's for them to decide. We said, in this particular case, that the communication of the Grain Commission, in our judgment, could be reasonably interpreted as a commitment to compensate. For that reason, we recommended in this case that there be compensation.
Do you want to talk about dispute resolution?