And they're politically appointed. Again, there was no job description we could actually compare to what the expectations were. It was very broad and very general. Essentially, they're political appointees.
We felt very strongly that without having benchmarks, check marks, accountability to the organization.... There were some examples we were presented with where it generated some dysfunction and undermined the overall credibility of the organization. Many individuals did an admirable job and generated benefits to producers. We acknowledged that, and we recognized that it should be preserved for the future. That's where we said make the mandate very clear and put it into a new organization called the office of grain farmer advocacy. That is the primary benefit provided by that role, as we understood it from stakeholders.