I have an observation, first of all, on KVD. I'm glad to see both of you come today and say that this is an important issue. I think APAS, in their presentation, said that there has been a cost to KVD. They'd like to see us move to some other system as soon as possible, and I'm glad to hear that because I think we need to make some changes, and this needs to be a focus of the committee's work on this CGC report.
I was concerned that the report and the recommendations on that really didn't touch at all on the issue. It talked for a couple of pages in the report about it, but it did not focus on it. To my mind, it's one of the primary issues in this review in western Canada--what we do with varietal designation and how we determine them--because it's going to set, to a huge extent, the direction of our industry and the success of it in the future.
So I want to thank you for being willing to focus on that today.
Mr. Reid talked about the fact that they'd be willing to go to more of an affidavit-type system with some certification. You've talked about penalties or disincentives. How much of a priority does your organization see this issue as, and would you be willing to move in that direction in terms of...? You said we need changes; it's costing us some money. What do you see as the solution, other than just that idea of penalties for introducing incorrect varieties?