The answer to that is a definite yes.
Our proposal I think works out to about a 53% reduction in our allowable level of domestic subsidy. There is just no way we can cover that by just shifting around boxes and the area we have available and so forth. If you really do the math, it just doesn't come out. We're talking about the amber box going down from around $19 billion to $7 billion, and for domestic support, that's the trade-distorting one. Then there's the de minimis...there are all these different boxes, you know. All those allowances would go down in half, so there's very much a definite reduction. Anybody who is saying otherwise is just trying to create a smokescreen so they can look at us rather than at themselves.