Right.
It has basically stuck to what we call the five program crops. I suppose I should name them now that I've mentioned them. It's wheat, corn, soybeans, cotton, and rice. Those get over 90% of the support.
We brought in I think peas and lentils in the last one. That was something the producers in some of the states that border Canada certainly were supportive of. They would say that Canada has always had support for their peas and lentils, and now that they have their industry developed, they don't want us to do this. I mean, you always get those types of debates going back and forth.
In terms of this Farm Bill, as I said, the secretary is very concerned about equitable treatment. Equitable treatment that's really.... You're talking about what they call specialty crops, which is a bit of a misnomer, because specialty crops, value-wise, actually account for half of the U.S. agricultural crop production.
It's not that these people are looking to have a program subsidy, such as what they have for corn or whatever. They're looking for investments in their future, in terms of research; in terms of dealing with phytosanitary issues, whether it's within the U.S. or overseas; in terms of helping with market development, and so forth. If you do the green box types of programs, which are not considered to be trade distorting, that's the type of support I think they are looking for out of this Farm Bill.
So you may see some direction like that. But, no, you're not suddenly going to see all kinds of crops coming in.