With what has happened on the softwood issue over the past number of years--essentially the ignoring of panel decisions--do you see that something like that may lead to disputes about sugar beets, where even though we may have a justifiable case, duties or surcharges may still be levied, knowing that with the precedent of the softwood deal the Americans would never have to pay the money back, or only part of it, or something like that?
On October 18th, 2006. See this statement in context.