These kinds of challenges are never without some difficulty, of course, because there are interest groups that play into this. We know that our cap played a big part in this, as well as a number of other matters pertaining to the politics of certain states. Elections, and this type of thing, all play into it.
I guess if we have standardized rules that we both believe are fair and safe when it comes to the health side.... We need to work as countries. Both Canada and the U.S. need to work toward standardization of principles, values, and standards that all of us trust--we trust you, you trust us. I think at some point we have to do that anyhow. Regardless of how clear we think the science is, we have to do that.
But I guess having said that, we have other matters. We have the softwood lumber issue. We have other issues, where we've had appeal after appeal, and after winning the appeals, we still don't have resolution. At what point does the appeal process work for us, or does it always work against us? I don't know. It comes to a point when you say, why have this appeal? It's very costly, and why have this appeal process if we don't live by the rulings of those appeal boards?