It's a good question, Paul, and it's not just semantics. I think that unless we have a margin-based program that meets the farmers' needs.... By meeting them, I list a number of things. The program has to be responsive, predictable, and involve less paperwork. It has to include negative margin coverages, changes in inventory valuation, quick payout for advances, and online calculators. If we can do all of these things in a margin-based program, I think farmers may accept it. But it will be completely different from what it started out as, and it will also have separate disaster programming.
So my hope is that if we can replace the current system with a separate disaster component—hopefully with a framework working with the provinces—and a separate margin-based program that deals with what margin-based programs are good at, farmers may find that acceptable. I'm hoping that will be the case.