The approach we took was that when the Wheat Board is contributing to research, which they are for some market development activities.... CWB II would probably not play the same role, because some of these benefit the entire industry; they don't just benefit one player.
Even if in our view it's going to be a significant player, we're giving three years. We felt the Government of Canada should pick up the cost for three years, in which time those entities will have to work out a different arrangement.
It could be that CWB will be a contributor, but along with others in the industry, whether it's through a check-off that is more widespread.... But since the benefits are widespread, it would be unlikely that the CWB II would be providing the same contribution the CWB currently does.