Mr. Chairman, I can think of any number of ways that the CWB II could construct its contractual arrangements with farmers. There are a variety of ways it could pool. There could be annual pools, shorter pools, or they could have two or three pools running simultaneously. There are almost an infinite number of possibilities that you could consider in terms of pooling.
But I think the significant thing for farmers is going to be that if they want to enter into a pool, the contractual arrangements they will have to enter into with CWB II are going to have to be conventional, commercial-type contracts with perhaps sign-up deadlines, but certainly with consequences, rewards, and penalties for performance and non-performance.
When we referred to a tighter application of contracting, that's what we meant.
Did that answer your question?