As with any issue, we look at it on a case-by-case basis and we have to assess the facts. In terms of this case or these cases, my belief is that it is a debt to the Crown. We haven't changed the policy from the first day, so it's not reversing a decision that we made earlier, saying you're now ineligible and have to repay the money. It's basically either through audit or discussion with the client, in review of the file, to say this entity, this producer wasn't actually eligible for the assistance provided. It wasn't that we've said we changed our minds, if you will.
On November 7th, 2006. See this statement in context.