It's obvious when you get a legal opinion.... What do you get one for, if you don't address it?
I mean, this motion is nothing short of grandstanding. I could probably agree to the A part of it because of the word "ability" in there. If ability was in the B part as well...because what ability indicates is having a choice, so to speak. The bottom line is that the government has no intention of doing it that way, and here you are distorting the thing totally. Regardless of whether it's out of order or not, the motion is ridiculous. You know what you're doing there.