I just wanted to mention that if a grain company sells canola to Japan and they aren't able to meet their contractual commitments, they don't go to the customer and say, “We didn't get the grain from the farmer, so we're going to be late”, or “We can't fulfill our obligations.” We have items in place in our contract with the farmer to mitigate damages.
CN and CP have demurrage. It may be the fault of the company or it may not be the fault of the company, as we said before. You plan your movements. If you're planning to get the car on Monday, it's going to end up at the terminal so that you can unload it in a timely way. If you don't get it on Wednesday, you take that into account with all the rest of the elevators, and you end up with bunching at a terminal. You can't unload the cars quickly enough because you got them all at the same time, and you pay demurrage. We have demurrage in place presumably to be used to mitigate the ill effects of that when spotting is required in the country.
We assume that the railway would take that demurrage, use it to increase car supply or whatever they need to do in order to ensure their commitments in the country. But what we're seeing is a demurrage penalty in place. However, we're also seeing CN using the fact that terminals can't unload the cars quickly enough—or maybe they didn't, which may or may not have been the terminal's fault—as a reason for why they couldn't spot in the country. But in our view, that's why demurrage is there.