Correct me if I'm wrong, but if a member brings a motion and the chair rules the motion out of order, then the member at that point has the right to challenge the chair. Nobody likes to do that, so sometimes a member might say, “Well, let me think about it. I'm going to have a look at it. I'm going to consider the evidence that you're giving and then bring it back.”
I think Wayne is at that point. He's at that point now, where he would still have the right to challenge the chair on that decision. I don't think there's an expiry of time, that there's an amount of time after the ruling of the chair during which you can challenge.
So we can have two ways of bringing this on the table: either accepting it as the motion, after he has had his chance, or Wayne can challenge the decision of the chair. Then the committee decides to uphold or not to uphold the decision of the chair. If the decision of the chair is not upheld, then the motion will be votable. That is my understanding.