I'll start out with that.
I have a high regard for democracy, and the board really does function now on the basis of simple majority. There have been decisions that have gone against perhaps what I wanted to see happen, but basically the deal is that you pitch in and support the board.
On the other hand, we have a split constituency out there, and there are a large number of farmers who want choice. I think it's reasonable that a board of directors would represent the wishes of both sides of the argument as we go forward.
It comes down just to a matter of simple professionalism. If you agree to certain terms of office, you abide by them. If the democratic choice of farmers in a plebiscite, as indicated by the minister, on barley says that it stays as a monopoly, we're bound by it and we'll be committed to it.