I'd like to follow up, actually, on Leon's statements. He's right. You made some statements here today that this has a high potential for this and concerns for that, but there's no scientific basis for it.
Our folks out there use the stronger solution. They've used it effectively. I would actually argue that the diluted bait is probably more of an environmental hazard than the stronger solution was, because you have to use so much more of it and it's spread all over the ground. Farmers were able to mix the other stuff, put it in small amounts down the gopher holes, and were able to do the job with that.
We were left without anything. It was a huge issue in my riding last fall. There were pictures in The Western Producer—I don't know if you saw them—of the gophers down the road. There were hundreds of them in the space of a quarter mile.
We had ranchers call about the fact that they were eating off entire quarter sections with the drought that's taking place in southwest Saskatchewan. So we need something. This has been taken away, and I'm even more concerned when I hear that there is no scientific rationale for taking it away. You can't provide it; it wasn't there in the first place and it can't be provided now. I think we need to take another look at this situation.