We did get some resources for implementing the new act, which started in 2003. I don't know that there was, at that time, a real recognition of the technology gap and the kinds of pressures upon us to look not just at what the registrants bring, but to also look in a more proactive sense at minor usage. There were funds. That's where we got funds to work with Agriculture Canada's Pest Management Centre, to start addressing the minor use issue in a proactive way. But projects such as the one I described, in which we're proactively looking at three active materials, are a brand new approach to looking at what the best use of our resources is in order to get the most minor uses approved.
The transparency requirements of the new act have made a big impact. Under the new act, when we receive a submission, we have to make that information public. When we propose a decision, we have to make that information public. When we finalize a decision, we have to make that information public. We got some resources, but they were again based on the numbers that were expected in the early 2000s.