Then it would no longer be equivalent, it would no longer have an equivalency certificate under own use import, and nobody would have access to it.
One of the advantages of GROU is that you do have the support and collaboration of the registrants. They are working in tandem. As I said, there have been 13 products nominated to GROU. All of the Canadian registrants provided us with specifications, and seven of the 12 have been found to meet the criteria to be considered materially identical under GROU. That's seven of 15.
For five of the products, there have been differences in formulations. Even if the product has exactly the same trade name north and south of the border, there have been found to be differences in either formulants or other issues that have said they're not the same.