Thank you.
You're also seeking a revision of the capital cost allowance, mainly because, as a result of technology, the economic life of equipment is much shorter. I thought I understood that it was a period of five to seven years and that that could fall to three to five years.
Farmers' incomes are said to be stable or declining. I'd be inclined to think they're falling, since many of the comments from farmers in my riding point in that direction, that is to say that expenses have risen, but that income is stable or has declined.
In your view, how many farmers can bear an equipment replacement cycle of three to five years?