A lot of us are certainly concerned about the U.S. and Europe talking and trying to narrow the gaps between them. We realize it's necessary and we want them to do it, but at the same time, we're concerned about what they might come up with. Unlike the last round, though, I don't think there's a possibility for the U.S. and Europe to agree on something and then simply impose it on the rest of the membership.
The power relationship among WTO members has shifted considerably, particularly with developing countries. If the U.S. and Europe come up with something, but it's opposed by some of the other major players, such as Brazil, India, China, and some of the key developing countries, then it's really not going to fly.
I think the U.S. and Europe are conscious of this. I think if they narrow the gap, they're going to start to try to sell whatever they put together more broadly. They'll gradually go to more and more countries to try to convince them of the merits of what they've come up with. The developing world will be the biggest challenge they'll have in that regard.
Part of our strategy in response to this is to work very closely with developing countries, as I mentioned. We're providing a lot of analysis to them, including Brazil and India specifically, on the impact we would see on offers put forward by the U.S. and by Europe. I think we've been of some help in advising them on whether or not an offer put forward has any value to it. To be honest, particularly on the domestic support side, we haven't seen offers that have been all that valuable up to this point.