The answer is no, and I think your answer is also no.
We have a situation where today we are discriminating against people who work off-farm under EI, employment insurance. I truly believe that we need to correct that for those people who work off-farm and find themselves for a period of time devoid of a job, but they can't draw employment insurance because they still have, as partners in the farming operation, a vested interest in that operation. Therefore, they can't draw employment insurance.
I believe that those people who can never draw it should not have to pay it in the first place. Would that be something you could agree with, or is it something you would see as beneficial? Those who can't benefit from EI should not have to pay EI. I don't pay EI, but you, working off-farm with a two-month layoff in the wintertime, can't draw employment insurance if you have an interest as a partner in the farm.