Yes, we have considered that, and that's part of the reason why we've put targeted support for primary producers into our diagram.
Let's face it, we have to understand what we're competing with. Farmers and processors can be very competitive here in Canada, but we also need competitive policy. If we have biofuels production here in Canada while the U.S. continues to put very directed trade-distorting support toward corn, grains, and that kind of stuff, our domestic producers creating that raw product are going to be at a competitive disadvantage. We might as well just import it from the U.S., and that won't be any good either.
Canada has the ability to target amber support. Of course, we want to avoid countervail risk. But the great thing about the biofuel industry is that we have a lot of capacity to use domestic production to create domestic biofuels for domestic consumption, without having to distort trade.
Some supports could be...and I'm not advocating for any particular type, but if we are serious about developing a domestic industry and supporting domestic producers for it, we have the ability to target some of that support through a new generation co-op, or other strategic partnership structure, to directly benefit primary producers in their ownership of processing, as well as in production, which could make us competitive. It's not just about how much money we spend; it's about how smart we spend it. There's certainly an ability for us to do that. It might require us to not always be the boy scout in terms of rules, but to try to see how we can make the rules work for us.