In terms of the top four needs, they're very similar to what Mr. Bjornson is saying here: renewable fuel standards to create that demand draw; parity with the U.S. in terms of tax incentives for processing and blending on the excise tax for fuel to further incentivize and create an environment of profitability and ability for that; and the creation of a stable environment for capital investment, which also provides the incentives for primary producers to invest, whether that be through loan guarantees, equity match programs, support for Iogen cooperatives, and that kind of stuff. The producer doesn't have to own all of it--although we would like that--but at least a portion of it, so they're part of that value-added and so they're part of growing beyond just pure raw commodity. The last need would be continued research, demonstration projects, and commercialization of our research achievements.
We have some world-class technologies, but we're not very good at commercializing them. Build a demonstration plant with Iogen so that we can demonstrate that this is a viable business, and people will invest. They will see that, and then the capital venture will be there. People will go where the money is, not only on the processing side, but on the raw commodity side, with energy-specific varieties and so on and so forth that help producers diversify beyond feed into nutraceuticals and other bio-economy products. This provides another avenue to drive up their commodity prices, move into these niche markets, and also have ownership in the contract.