Just quickly, we talked about two things at the Dairy Farmers of Canada annual meeting. One was the use of article 28. The dairy farmers have said, and we've become convinced, that there has been a spike in the amount of MPCs used in Canada and that the numbers continue to rise rapidly. We became convinced from doing our own research that article 28 was in the best interests of Canada and supply management, and they wanted us to use it. We moved ahead on that. It hasn't been done before. It was a pretty aggressive thing. Even though we took a little flak internationally on it, we think it was necessary.
This was also the culmination of our dairy industry working group announcement as well. They met over the summer, into the fall, and even over Christmas. We talked about ways we could find a balance on compositional standards for cheese. The processors and farmers had been unable to come to a complete agreement on this, but there was a moderator's report that we felt was close enough to an agreement.
We wanted to move ahead, so we're moving ahead where we can with that report while encouraging the dairy industry working group to continue with other work they need to do. Those two things will offer some short-term help and security for supply management. The compositional standards and the dairy industry working group is an effort to bring longer-term growth and stability to the industry. I think that is actually pretty key.
Do you want Steve to briefly address the other issue?