The key question for us here—and we've seen it in all the other agricultural commodities that aren't under supply management—is that very often producers are disadvantaged. The fact of the matter is that in the dairy system, for example, under supply management, we're a heck of a lot freer traders than are the Americans. We allow more product in here than they allow in there. So it is a system that works.
You made a comment that you have to look at the long run, and that's true. I recognize that. That's what worries me. Just going with an article 28 doesn't necessarily signify that you're strongly supportive of supply management. What is happening with offering choice on the Canadian Wheat Board is that, based on that principle, if a number of producers want to produce and sell outside the supply management system, that's their choice. If they want to do that in Quebec, outside the single-desk selling system, within those commodities, which you really don't have jurisdiction over, would you allow that to happen, as well?
It's the same principle. If you're going to allow choice to individuals to undercut the single-desk selling of the Canadian Wheat Board, are you going to eventually, in Mr. Emerson's long run, allow choice to undercut the supply management system itself, by individuals?