I'll seek assistance from others involved in that type of programming.
Mr. Chair, in responding to that, I would just come back to the important fact that with the smaller facilities, of course, in preparing the legislation, in addition to the 12-month window from last June until July of this year, there's been an additional six months beyond that to again help them and try to resolve a number of the issues you've raised.
I think the purpose of the legislation has been very clear and very well supported by all, and perhaps one of the dynamics that we continue to hear as a challenge for people is that unlike most legislation, which is very prescriptive and gives you very little room to figure out how you're going to do something, this legislation was worked on for an extended period of time to provide for these flexibilities, to look at new technology, to be open and adaptive and conceptual, to say that there are many ways we can achieve the outcome and to create that R and D environment and find that alternate use.
Maybe we've done a disservice by being so flexible because it's created this dynamic of everybody looking at opportunities, but the ability to do composting, to do biofuels, and to do these thermo and other processes I think is actually, at the end of the day, a win-win for us.
But again, to address the issue of whether all the smaller facilities will be able to take advantage, I think we've heard clearly, both from the provinces and some of the industry people, that it may not in fact be the case in the longer term.
In terms of other programming, I don't know, Graham or Susie, if there's anything you would share from a departmental perspective in terms of the support that has been ongoing from government to the various industry sectors as we continue the longer strategy of full recovery from BSE.