That is a good question. We would contend that it is usually in the public's best interest to underpin a sector, an agriculture sector, in times of short-term disaster. Our industry, the cattle industry, has been a recipient of some of that support during our recent disaster, and there's no doubt that the infrastructure within our industry would not have remained as intact as it has except for some assistance from governments during that time.
So I do see a role when it comes to a disaster program framework and potential funding to fall out of that.
I also see a danger in ongoing support of a sector, regardless of which agriculture sector it may be, to prop up a sector or producers that really aren't viable. That tends to create uncompetitive participants within the industry, and as they become less competitive, the cry for more will just become louder.
So we see a role from a disaster standpoint and a much lesser role as far as ongoing support is concerned.