You talked about the U.S. level of support. We'd like to have that. Generally that would help. We want to be careful nationally about whether we go down the road of that type of program. It could expose us to trade challenges or countervail challenges, so we have to be careful on that.
Crop insurance, or compliance, or having both.... That's what we proposed in Ontario, because what happens when we go to government is that they ask whether all the risks are covered, and whether producers are covering all the risks. What they don't want to get into is a place where people are choosing, then all of a sudden get to a point where there's a disaster and producers aren't covered and then they have to go back and get ad hoc relief. That's why in Ontario we were looking at having cross-compliance between our proposed program and crop insurance.
As for the lifestyle as distinct from business-type farming, the ASRA program has lower levels. There are such components in some of our programs, where there are criteria of size before you actually get into the programs.