Let me ask, if you'll permit me to ask a more general question, about the philosophy surrounding government intervention.
In many countries, of course, there are subsidies for producers, and in Canada we see more support for insurance programs and for market allocation measures such as quotas.
Do you think farmers would actually be better off in the long run with stable and predictable subsidies combined with flexible financial products from banks, such as payment option loans that could carry farmers through crop failures?
You mentioned that the banks recognize the cyclical nature, the peaks and valleys that farmers experience. And farmers always appear to get credit; I think that was the other comment that was made. When there's a crash, or when there's some kind of catastrophe, government always steps in.
Do you think that payment option loans would be a feasible way to go?