I'd like to respond, if you don't mind, James.
I look at them and I have a problem when we use the word “pillars”. And we have “silos”, or we have.... I know it's a way of focusing the issues, but I'm afraid that we get into those “pillars” and we stay there, so everybody who's in that box is in that box and not looking at the one beside him. I think the analogy I used in British Columbia in the first round is that they're not pillars, they're sand dunes. And every sand dune touches another sand dune, whether it's halfway up or.... We have to look at that type of connection, because to separate which is more important, we don't recognize that they all touch and they all have effects and we have to get to that. So smart regulations are an issue. That's what you're looking at. You have to make sure the connection is made; otherwise, they become isolated.
For me, like you, James, I would say business risk management right now is an immediate problem. It's something that's in front of us right now. Science and innovation is the second pillar for me. That's where I see the future and the potential for the long-term sustainability of agriculture. That takes longer to happen, but we have to make sure we have the mechanism, the infrastructure, and the tax incentives to keep this thing going. But that's what has got us here and what's going to keep doing it. That's not to say any of the other ones aren't important, but that sand dune just has to keep going across.