Very quickly, I certainly agree with your comments around a food security policy. I think that has to be the starting point on which the whole framework hangs.
In terms of federal-provincial, just as Ernie mentioned, I think that will be a challenge. The framework has to be a federal-provincial agreement along with industry, because if you're going to have a food security policy, it has to be endorsed by the federal government and the provinces.
In terms of risk management programming, I think what you're talking about is the self-directed risk management approach. We would certainly support that direction. When I look at all the dollars that are spent in all the different programs and things, I sometimes think that we could be a lot more effective if we had a much more self-managed account for the producer--put the dollars in and let the producer decide how he wants to access those funds and use them. Sometimes your best risk management is some capital investment or infrastructure on your farm, and you should be able to use the account for those types of things. If it's a disaster--market return, income drop, all of those kinds of things--if you had a much more self-directed approach, I think it's something that should continue to be looked at.