The specific subsection I think is 32(1), that the Wheat Board is required to market all grain offered to it. They have failed to do that, and they have not been called to account for that. That is the effect on the CAIS program relating to that specific part of the act. If they're not going to do that, how are farmers supposed to remain profitable?
So it's a policy decision by the board not to do that, and they have openly made statements that they had intentionally withheld grain from the market because they felt the market was not appropriate to sell into. That's not their mandate. The requirement is to sell all the grain offered to it. It's a farmer's-only choice.
So when you come out with a program to address risk management and market shortfalls on an individual basis, how can you have the two and not be competing? You have a program to address income shortfalls, but they're not allowed to use it because we're dependent on the Wheat Board to market our product and they refuse to do it.